Online Business Deal Highlights

Latest price drop of 14.3%, from roughly $846K to $726K, a reduction of about $121K, for this 8-year-old Amazon FBA dance products brand. More notably, this is the fourth recorded reduction in 134 days, leaving the ask roughly 38% below its original $1.16M price.

Timeline: First detected on DealSlide on April 15, 2026, at about $1.16M. After multiple reductions in May and August, the seller has now cut roughly $438K from the original ask in just over four months.

The numbers at the new price: The business reports roughly $144K average monthly revenue / $40K monthly profit, or about $1.73M annualized revenue / $480K annualized profit, with a 28% margin. At $726K, the ask is down to approximately 0.4x revenue and 1.5x profit. The owner reports about 16 hours per week of involvement across PPC, inventory planning and supplier coordination.

On the price drop: A 1.5x profit multiple looks low for an established 8-year-old brand, but there are some deal-specific details buyers need to understand before reading too much into that number. Inventory is excluded from the asking price, the trademark is reportedly owned by the supplier, and the Amazon Seller Central transfer involves a China-based setup. Combined with four price cuts, those terms may be as important as the operating performance in explaining why the deal has not cleared.

The most important question to ask: What buyer feedback has driven the move from $1.16M to $726K, and how should a buyer evaluate the additional inventory cost, supplier-owned trademark and Seller Central transfer alongside the stated purchase price?

DealSlide tracked this 5-year-old Amazon FBA kitchen brand from a $1.16M asking price to an official sold status in 109 days. The more interesting timing: it went pending after just 20 days, then spent 89 days under offer before closing. Th…

DealSlide tracked this 19-year-old media relations agency going under contract for a second time, just 51 days after returning to market, at an $11.75M asking price. The numbers: Merge reports roughly $5.9M TTM revenue / $2.1M adjusted EBIT…

DealSlide tracked this creative research and media agency returning to market after 114 days pending, following nearly four months under offer at a $3.23M asking price. For a deal this size, the length of the failed transaction is the main thing worth digging into.

Timeline: First detected on DealSlide on January 6, 2026, the agency spent 120 days on the market before going pending on May 6. It then remained under offer for another 114 days before returning on August 28, putting the total tracked timeline at nearly 8 months.

The numbers: GoMerge reports roughly $3.73M revenue / $808K adjusted EBITDA, a 22% EBITDA margin, putting the $3.23M ask at about 0.9x revenue and 4.0x EBITDA. About 85% of revenue comes from monthly retainers, equivalent to roughly $3.2M of annual revenue, and the firm has 14 W-2 employees plus contractors. The reported $792K weighted average client spend also makes client concentration particularly important to understand.

On the failed deal: A 114-day pending period is long enough that a buyer likely progressed well beyond an initial offer, making the reason it fell apart more important than simply knowing the business is available again. If meaningful diligence was completed, there may also be useful information the broker can share about what was reviewed, what concerns came up and whether the seller's expectations changed as a result.

The most important question to ask: What specifically caused the previous deal to fall apart after 114 days under offer, and did diligence uncover anything related to client concentration, retention, financials or operations that a new buyer should know?

This 15-year-old B2B research and consulting firm generates roughly $3.4M in revenue / $1.1M adjusted EBITDA, with about 50% of revenue coming from retainers. Some project-based client relationships have lasted more than 10 years, which stands out for a services business.

The numbers: The $4.5M asking price works out to approximately 1.3x revenue and 4.0x adjusted EBITDA. The business reports a 33% EBITDA margin, supported by a team of 18 W-2 employees and 4 contractors.

How it works: The firm conducts qualitative and quantitative customer research for B2B software, healthcare technology and legal-services companies, then extends those engagements into consulting, training, messaging, sales enablement and creative work. Revenue is roughly split between recurring retainers and project work, giving the firm multiple ways to expand existing accounts.

Operations: Growth has historically come from repeat business, referrals and long-standing client relationships rather than a heavily scaled outbound or paid acquisition engine. The company reports 94% YTD customer satisfaction, with annual scores consistently above 90%, and has an established leadership team operating beneath the founder.

The seller situation: The main transition issue is relationship ownership. With long-tenured clients and referral-driven growth, it is important to understand how much revenue and new business still depends on the founder personally versus relationships already owned by the broader leadership team.

Worth asking: What percentage of revenue comes from the top five clients, how much of the 50% retainer revenue is contractually committed, and how much client retention and new business currently depends on the founder?

This 12-year-old AI, machine learning and product engineering firm reports 89% YoY growth, roughly $240K in current MRR, and a recurring embedded-engineer model with 19 senior engineers currently deployed. Website Closers also says the company has not lost a recurring-seat client under the current model.

The numbers: The $2.7M asking price is based on roughly $2.25M in gross income and $905K in cash flow, or about 1.2x revenue and 3.0x cash flow. That implies a roughly 40% cash-flow margin, notable for a services business where delivery depends heavily on technical talent. The deal is not expected to qualify for SBA financing, although the seller is open to partial seller financing.

How it works: The core offering is recurring Engineering-as-a-Service, with senior L5+ engineers embedded directly into client AI, data and product teams under agreements typically lasting about 12 months. Seats are described as $5K–$12K per engineer per month, while shorter project engagements range from roughly $20K to $250K and reportedly generate a 65% repeat-client rate.

Operations: The company is fully remote and appears to have meaningful delivery infrastructure already in place. Team leads manage client relationships, while project managers and senior engineers oversee execution. The recruiting network includes 100+ vetted engineers and data specialists. The owner reportedly spends only a few hours per week on sales, high-level client management and invoicing, with up to 180 days of post-close advisory support offered.

The seller situation: The public listing does not explain why the owner is selling despite the reported 89% growth and recurring client base. More importantly, the MRR figures suggest client concentration may matter: $240K of current MRR across 19 deployed engineers does not cleanly align with the stated $5K–$12K monthly seat pricing, and the listing also references roughly $60K MRR per active client.

Worth asking: Can the seller reconcile the $240K current MRR, 19 deployed engineers, stated seat pricing and $2.25M annual revenue, and provide revenue, profit and renewal dates by client so buyer concentration is clear?

Significant price drop of 41.2%, from $8.5M to $5M, a $3.5M reduction, for this 14-year-old fully remote B2B digital marketing agency. It is the first recorded price cut after 233 days tracked by DealSlide.

Timeline: First detected on DealSlide on January 5, 2026, at $8.5M, where the ask remained for more than seven months before the August 26 reduction. Rather than a series of smaller adjustments, the seller moved directly to $5M in a single cut.

The numbers at the new price: The agency reports roughly $2.9M annual revenue / $1.65M SDE, a 57% margin, putting the new ask at about 1.7x revenue and 3.0x SDE. At the original $8.5M price, those same earnings would have implied roughly 2.9x revenue and 5.2x SDE, so the valuation has changed materially. About 80% of revenue is recurring or contract-based, with roughly 30 clients, six employees and two NBA teams among the client roster.

On the price drop: The combination of a $3.5M one-time cut, seven months without a prior reduction and a new multiple of roughly 3.0x SDE is what stands out. The financial profile itself remains notable for an agency: 57% SDE margin and roughly $2.3M of recurring or contract-based revenue based on the reported 80% mix.

The most important question to ask: What specifically prompted the move from $8.5M to $5M after 233 days, and have revenue, client retention, owner involvement or any major contracts changed since the original valuation was set?

DealSlide tracked this 8-year-old leadership development and organizational effectiveness firm going pending after 65 days on the market at a $1.5M asking price, with no recorded price reduction before the status change. The numbers: Websit…

DealSlide tracked this 2-year-old DTC furniture brand for 250 days before Flippa marked it sold for a second time at a $200K asking price. The unusual part is the status history: it was marked sold, returned to market five days later, then …

Latest price drop of 22.9%, from $1.75M to $1.35M, a $400K cut. More notably, this is the fifth recorded reduction in 42 days, taking the ask down 55.6% from roughly $3.04M when DealSlide first detected it.

Timeline: First detected on DealSlide on July 14, 2026, at about $3.04M. The listing has now gone through five price cuts in roughly six weeks and was also inactive for three days before returning to market on July 24.

The numbers at the new price: The app reports $603K TTM revenue / $460K TTM profit, a 76% margin, with 36% annual growth. At $1.35M, the ask is down to roughly 2.2x revenue and 2.9x profit, versus about 5.0x revenue and 6.6x profit at the original $3.04M price. Last month came in at about $45K revenue / $36K profit, slightly below the TTM monthly averages of roughly $50K revenue / $38K profit.

On the price drop: The operating scale is still notable: 1M+ digital deliveries per month, $16M+ in monthly merchant GMV, 2,500+ customers and 700+ five-star reviews. But five reductions and a total $1.69M cut from the original ask make the pricing history the bigger story now. The seller has moved from a premium valuation to below 3x TTM profit in just six weeks.

The most important question to ask: What specifically drove the price from $3.04M to $1.35M in 42 days, and did anything change in revenue, profit, customer churn or operations during that period?

DealSlide tracked this 1-year-old faceless YouTube channel through five price cuts from $397K to $91K, a 77% reduction, before Empire Flippers officially marked it sold 113 days after first detection. The pricing history is the standout: th…

DealSlide tracked this 3-year-old medical language-learning subscription app going pending after 98 days on the market at a $317K asking price. The more interesting timing: it went pending just 19 days after its latest price reduction. The …