Online Business Deal Highlights

DealSlide tracked this marketing and public relations agency going pending after just 24 days on the market at a $1M asking price, with no recorded price change. The numbers: Website Closers reports approximately $1.3M gross revenue / $302K…

DealSlide tracked this Amazon FBA beauty brand for 223 days from first detection to sold, while the asking price fell from $1.13M to $194K, an 83% reduction. The timeline: First detected on February 12, 2026, the listing remained available …

Latest price drop: 25.5%, from approximately $3.40M to $2.54M, an $868K reduction, for this Amazon FBA/FBM portfolio of health, personal care, and wellness brands.

Timeline: First detected on DealSlide on July 23, 2026, at $3.38M, the ask increased slightly to approximately $3.40M in August before this first recorded price reduction on September 23. After 62 days tracked, the current ask is about 25% below the original DealSlide-detected price.

The numbers at the new price: The business reports approximately $1.74M annual revenue / $818K net profit, a roughly 47% profit margin. At the $2.54M ask, that equals about 1.5x revenue and 3.1x profit. Approximately 97% of revenue comes through Amazon FBA, the owner reports about 8 hours of weekly involvement, and the business is SBA pre-qualified.

On the price drop: The nearly $868K single-step reduction is the main development after roughly two months on the market. The listing also notes that inventory is generally not included in the asking price and that the acquisition involves two Seller Central accounts.

The most important question to ask: What specifically drove the 25.5% reduction, and have revenue, profit, inventory requirements, or Amazon account performance changed since the original asking price?

Founded in October 2024, this B2B data-as-a-service platform provides gaming advertisers with privacy-safe audience segments for campaigns across social advertising channels. Revenue comes from fixed-fee contracts plus performance-based fees tied to advertiser ad spend.

The numbers: The $14M ask is based on approximately $3.49M TTM revenue / $2.71M profit, a roughly 78% profit margin, or about 4.0x revenue and 5.2x profit. The listing reports $3.2M ARR, while last month’s $261K revenue annualizes to approximately $3.13M.

Why it’s interesting: The seller reports 98% retention and 133% net revenue retention among top-tier accounts, seven new Tier-1 advertisers ramping, and a $5.5M+ weighted pipeline. The business is bootstrapped and reports no paid marketing. Acquire also marks the listing as Guided by Acquire.

What to watch: The listing shows figures that need to be reconciled. Acquire displays 52% annual growth, while the seller’s asking-price rationale cites 84% YoY growth. Overall churn is also listed at 10%+, despite the stronger retention metrics reported for top-tier accounts.

Worth asking: What explains the 52% versus 84% growth figures? How do churn, retention, and NRR differ by customer tier? What percentage of revenue comes from fixed contracts versus performance-based fees, and how concentrated is revenue among the largest advertisers?

DealSlide tracked this AI creative SaaS returning after 26 days inactive with an 18.9% price cut, from $2.71M to $2.2M, a roughly $514K reduction.

Timeline: First detected on July 22, 2026, at $2.71M, the listing was marked delisted on August 27 after 36 days tracked. It returned on September 23 after 26 days off market at the lower $2.2M ask.

The numbers: Acquire reports approximately $1.1M TTM revenue / $676K SDE, putting the current ask at roughly 2.0x revenue and 3.3x SDE. The company also reports $750K ARR, 1,000–5,000 customers, 10% annual growth, and 5–10% declining churn. Founded in May 2023, the business operates a B2B subscription model focused on AI-powered ad, email, and landing-page creative. The listing is also Guided by Acquire.

On the return: DealSlide recorded the prior status as delisted, not pending, so there is no indication that a transaction was under contract or fell through. The main change on return is the $514K reduction in asking price.

The most important question to ask: Why was the listing inactive for 26 days, what drove the 18.9% reduction, and how should buyers reconcile the reported $750K ARR with $1.1M TTM revenue?

DealSlide tracked this B2B data SaaS moving under offer after an 18-day delisted period, following 32 days initially on the market, at a $1.4M asking price. The numbers: Acquire reports approximately $336K TTM revenue / $256K TTM SDE, putti…

DealSlide tracked this matcha and supplements eCommerce business going under offer for a second time, after spending 82 days back on the market at a $3M asking price. The numbers: Quiet Light reports approximately $2.6M annual revenue / $80…

Latest price drop: 9.5%, from $2.1M to $1.9M, a $200K reduction, for this running-content and race-directory business.

Timeline: First detected on DealSlide on June 27, 2026, at $2.1M. This is the first recorded price reduction after 86 days tracked, with the ask dropping to $1.9M on September 21.

The numbers at the new price: The business reports approximately $1.03M TTM revenue / $558K SDE, a roughly 54% SDE margin. At the $1.9M ask, that equals about 1.8x revenue and 3.4x SDE. The listing says revenue has more than doubled since 2022, while advertiser retention exceeds 75% for customers spending $1K+ annually and 95% for those spending $10K+.

On the price drop: DealSlide tracked the listing at the original $2.1M ask for nearly three months before this first reduction. The business is supported by seven part-time contractors, while both founders report approximately 10–20 hours of weekly involvement each.

The most important question to ask: What specifically drove the $200K reduction, and have revenue growth, advertiser retention, or founder involvement changed since the original $2.1M ask?

DealSlide tracked this multi-brand eCommerce business for 173 days before Flippa marked it sold, while the asking price fell from $995K to $480K, a $515K or 52% reduction. The timeline: First detected on April 2, 2026, at $995K, the ask dro…

Founded in 2001, this online dating and relationship platform has operated for roughly 25 years. Transworld describes the business as focused on authenticity, community, and relationship building.

The numbers: The $1.75M ask is based on approximately $1.69M sales / $588.8K SDE, a roughly 35% SDE margin, or about 1.0x revenue and 3.0x SDE. The listing also shows a $1.3M down payment.

Why it’s interesting: The operating history is the standout. Few consumer internet businesses currently for sale were established as early as 2001, giving the platform more than two decades of operating history. The seller lists other business interests as the reason for selling.

What to watch: The public listing provides limited operating detail beyond the financials and company history. It does not disclose the monetization model, membership or paid-subscriber counts, traffic, acquisition channels, owner involvement, or team structure.

Worth asking: How is the $1.69M of revenue generated, and what are the current paid-member count, ARPU, churn, and retention? How have revenue and SDE trended over the past 3–5 years, and what are the primary customer-acquisition channels today?

DealSlide tracked this enterprise QA services business returning after 117 days inactive at a $3.2M asking price, down about 2% from its previous $3.264M ask.

Timeline: First detected on February 17, 2026, at $2.163M, the ask increased 50.9% to $3.264M on April 28. The listing was marked delisted on May 28 after 100 days tracked and returned on September 22 after nearly four months off market.

The numbers: Acquire reports approximately $2.6M TTM revenue / $660K TTM profit, putting the $3.2M ask at roughly 1.2x revenue and 4.8x profit. The company operates across retainers, projects, and staff augmentation, serving 10–50 enterprise customers with reported 1–3% stable churn. Its internally developed tools include AI-assisted products for bug reporting, test automation, compliance auditing, recruiting, and sales intelligence. The listing is also Under M&A advisory on Acquire, meaning the listing is being managed by a professional M&A Advisor through Acquire.

On the return: DealSlide recorded the prior status as delisted, not pending, so there is no indication that a transaction was under contract or fell through. The listing returned after 117 days inactive at $3.2M, only slightly below its prior ask but still roughly 48% above the original tracked price.

The most important question to ask: Why was the listing inactive for 117 days, and what changed in the business or sale process before it returned at $3.2M?

This BFS-approved Shopify app portfolio combines two Shopify SaaS apps with approximately $43.4K ARR, 1,084 current subscriptions, $42.9K TTM revenue, and $38.2K TTM profit, an approximately 89% TTM profit margin. Both products generate recurring B2B subscription revenue through the Shopify App Store.

The numbers: At the $140K ask, the portfolio is priced at roughly 3.3x TTM revenue, 3.7x TTM profit, and 3.2x ARR. Acquire also reports 2,900+ installed merchants, more than $66K in combined lifetime Shopify earnings, and 100% annual growth.

What stands out: The sale includes two codebases, two established Shopify App Store listings, customer bases, websites, IP, and related operating assets. The apps carry 4.8-star and 4.9-star ratings, giving each product its own installed base and review history rather than concentrating the portfolio in a single app.

What to watch: Portfolio-level metrics can obscure differences between the two products. Revenue, subscriber concentration, churn, support requirements, and maintenance workload should be reviewed separately for each app. Acquire reports 5-10% stable churn at the customer-metrics level, and lists the tech stack as PHP, JavaScript, HTML, and CSS.

Things to Consider During Due Diligence: How do revenue, profit, subscriptions, churn, and support load split between the two apps? How long have current subscribers been retained? What ongoing development and maintenance work is required across the codebases? Does the India-based seller/location affect handover, support hours, entity transfer, or post-close transition logistics?