DealSlide detected this faceless entertainment YouTube channel back on the market after being marked sold/inactive for 19 days. Three days after returning, it was converted to a $36K fixed-price listing, 35.7% below the $56K price before it went inactive.

Timeline: First detected on DealSlide on June 24 at $73K. The price fell to $65K on June 26 and $56K on July 1 before DealSlide recorded one bid and the listing went sold/inactive on July 24. It returned August 13 and was converted from an auction to the current fixed price on August 16.

The numbers: Flippa reports $54K annual revenue / $48K annual profit, an 89% profit margin. At $36K, the channel is priced at roughly 0.7x revenue and 0.8x profit, and is now 50.8% below its original $73K ask.

On the failed deal: The listing went directly to sold/inactive rather than through a standard pending period, so it is unclear how far the previous buyer got. Flippa also commonly uses "sold" before a transaction has necessarily closed, making it especially important to understand whether this was simply a failed buyer process or whether something surfaced during diligence.

The most important question to ask: What caused the previous transaction to fall through, and did the prior buyer uncover anything during diligence that contributed to the listing returning at a substantially lower price?